【世事解评】一个非专业人士的学习笔记——闫博士第三篇报告详读浅释(3)

作者:纽约香草山写作一组 霍比特人

Significant movements had also taken place in the scientific circle in the west. On February 19th, 2020, a statement signed by 27 experts was published on the influential journal Lancet13. In this statement, the scientists asserted a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 and condemned “conspiracy theories” that suggested a laboratory origin of the virus. It was later revealed through exposed email exchanges that, intriguingly, their assertion on the virus’ origin was accepted by the signees in the absence of any scientific discussions or supporting evidence14,15. Furthermore, the statement was organized secretly by Dr. Peter Daszak, CEO of the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance and long-term collaborator of Dr. Zhengli Shi and the WIV. In fact, it was through Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance that millions of NIH funding, which are US tax dollars, were channeled to the WIV and used presumably in military-civil fusion projects there. This conflict of interest (COI) was very likely what prompted Daszak to keep his central role in the Lancet statement under the radar. Though, the same COI somehow failed to discourage him from leading the WHO investigation of the origin of COVID-19 in 2021 and subsequently “concluding” that SARS-CoV-2 is “extremely unlikely” to have come from a laboratory. Interestingly, when the NIH funding was discontinued for EcoHealth Alliance in 2020, Daszak was immediately offered a donation of half a million dollars from an anonymous foundation (Figure 1). It is not known whether or not this donation played any role in encouraging Daszak’s actions in supporting the CCP government. 

【译】巨大的行动同样在西方科学界展开。2020年2月19日,27名专家联名在著名杂志《柳叶刀》上发文,称科学家们断言新冠起源于自然,并谴责“阴谋论”,即认为新冠起源于实验室的说法。后来通过揭露的邮件可以看到,有趣的是他们对新冠自然起源的断言是在没有任何科学讨论和支持性证据的情况下签署的。另外,宣言是秘密地由彼得·达扎克——非盈利组织环保生态健康联盟的CEO兼石正丽博士和武汉所的长期合作者——组织的。事实上,就是通过达扎克和环保生态健康联盟,成百万的NIH基金的钱——都是美国纳税人的钱——流向了武汉病毒研究所被用于军民融合项目。这种利益冲突(COI)很可能推动达扎克低调地扮演了《柳叶刀》事件的主角。同样的利益冲突使他无法担任2020年WHO调查COVID-19起源的领导,该调查随后得出结论说新冠极不可能来自实验室。有趣的是,当NIH基金在2020年中止流向环保生态健康联盟时,达扎克立即被一个匿名组织提供了50万美元赞助(图1)。这一赞助在达扎克支持中共政府的行动中扮演了什么角色尚未可知。

Figure 1. Exposed email shows that an anonymous donation of $500,000 was made to EcoHealth Alliance to partially offset the NIH funds withdrawn. 

【译】(图1邮件大意)

兰迪·谢克曼(诺奖得主)写道:

我是理查·罗伯茨团队成员并帮助串联更多获奖者参加阿扎和科林斯请愿。我们不期待他们做出回应,但希望给你的重要工作做出帮助性的贡献,因而参与串联私人资金以弥补你的损失。我们的第一个成功是获得了一个以各种理由搞匿名赞助的基金的支持,理由包括支持生物医学科学。我很高兴报告这个团队将提供给环保生态联盟50万美元,以至少部分弥补从你的项目中抽走的NIH基金。因为他们希望保持匿名,我将很高兴担当中间人给你的项目提供资金。我们可以继续沟通如何进行下一步。

图1揭露的邮件显示一个匿名组织为环保生态健康联盟提供了50万美元以弥补其因为NIH基金抽走遭受的损失。

【浅释】“利益冲突”(COI)是法律用语,简单说就是甲和乙打官司,乙有个做律师的儿子丙,丙是不能接受甲的委托的,那样他就处于利益冲突中,而不能保证为委托人提供合格的服务。这里达扎克与中共有巨大金钱关系,是不可以接受西方的委托调查病毒来源的。他秘密扮演串联的角色为中共服务,并可疑地获得了来路不明的50万美元。

【浅释】“阿扎和科林斯请愿”指的是2020年5月20日,77名美国获奖者要求美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)院长科林斯,以及卫生和公共服务部部长阿扎采取紧急行动,审查NIH基金抽走资金中止与中国合作研究蝙蝠冠状病毒的决定。也就是说,这些所谓科学家在新冠爆发后,为了钱(科研资金)要求继续与中共合作进行蝙蝠冠状病毒的研究。

It is also worth mentioning that Dr. Linfa Wang from Duke-NUS Medical School and Dr. Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina, both long-term collaborators of Zhengli Shi and the WIV, also consciously distanced themselves from the Lancet statement to make sure that the statement “doesn’t link back to our collaboration” because “(o)therwise it looks self-serving and we lose impact” (Figure 2)16.

【译】同样值得注意的是来自杜克-新加坡国立大学的王林发博士和北卡罗来纳大学的拉尔夫·巴里克,两者都是石正丽以及武汉所的长期合作伙伴,也有意远离《柳叶刀》声明以确保该声明不会“牵连到我们的合作”,因为“否则会显得自私自利而我们将失去名声”。(图2)

Figure 2. Exposed email shows Peter Daszak, Linfa Wang, and Ralph Baric purposely avoided signing the Lancet statement although Daszak eventually signed likely because of the central role he played in organizing this statement.

【译】(图2邮件大意)

拉尔夫发的邮件:标题:不需要你在声明上签字。 内容:我也认为这是个好决定,否则看起来自私自利而我们会失去名声。

达扎克发的邮件:昨晚我和(王)林发谈了关于我们散发的声明,他认为,我也同意,你、我和他都不应该在声明上签字,这样能离它远一点因而不会产生反效果。

吉姆·哈格斯、琳达·赛芙、休谟·菲尔德和丽塔.科尔韦尔我相信会签的,然后今晚我会给一些关键人物发一圈。那样我们就能用这种不会牵连到我们的合作的方式把它推开一点,以最大限度弄出一种独立的声音。

图2:揭露的邮件显示彼得·达扎克、王林发和拉尔夫有目的地回避签署《柳叶刀》声明,尽管达扎克最后因为他扮演的中心人物角色不得不签了。

【浅释】这里的叙述以及这些邮件表明,这些与中共勾结的西方科学家为了钱秘密地私下串联制造出伪科学的巨大声音为中共服务,而他们很清楚这是自私自利和丢脸的,所以尽量伪装成与此无关,无耻而卖力地为中共洗地。

In addition to the Lancet statement, on March 17th, 2020, an opinion article titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” was published on the top journal Nature Medicine17. Here the authors also asserted a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 despite that no convincing evidence was provided and that their theory was built upon the fabricated RaTG13 virus published by Zhengli Shi. Among the five authors of this article was Dr. Ian Lipkin from Columbia University, who, like Daszak, has close ties with China and has received several prestigious awards from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government in the past two decades18,19. 

【译】作为对《柳叶刀》声明的补充,2020年3月,一份名为“接近的新冠起源”的观点文章发表在顶级刊物Nature Medicine上。该文作者也断言新冠起源于自然,尽管没有提供令人信服的证据,且其理论是建立在石正丽伪造的RaTG13基础上的。五位作者中有来自哥伦比亚大学的伊恩·利普金博士,他和达扎克一样与中共有密切关系且在过去二十年里接受了中共许多显赫的奖励。

The Lancet statement and the Nature Medicine article, although baseless scientifically, both concluded that SARS-CoV-2 is a natural occurring pathogen. These publications had subsequently been promoted greatly on traditional media, social media, and other platforms. The result of these combined operations was to declare to the scientific community: SARS-CoV-2 having a natural origin is the official, accepted view; any dissenting voices would be condemned and dismissed by experts of the field

Therefore, unsurprisingly, although various scientific evidence continued to emerge pointing to the laboratory origin of SARS-CoV-2, much of such information was suppressed fairly efficiently. The public’s opinion of the virus’ origin remained dominated by the natural origin theory. 

【译】《柳叶刀》声明和Nature Medicine文章,尽管基本上都是非科学的,却都得出结论说新冠是自然出现的病毒。这些刊物被大量推荐在传统媒体、社交媒体和其他平台上。这些做法的综合结果就是向科学界宣布,新冠起源于自然是官方结论,是既定的观点,任何不同的声音都会被自然起源理论所谴责。 

However, the truth was not meant to be blocked. While Dr. Yan continued to use the LUDE Media to expose various facts of COVID-19, including providing intelligence information (For example, pointing out that the Lancet statement was an organized effort to suppress the laboratory origin theories) and sharing her expert analyses on aspects of asymptomatic infections, antibody evaluation, autopsy studies, treatment strategies, vaccine development, etc., her identity was eventually discovered by the CCP government, which forced her to leave Hong Kong. At the end of April 2020, Dr. Yan successfully escaped from Hong Kong and arrived at the US. Here she continued to reveal the truth of SARS-CoV-2 to the world. On July 10th, 2020, Dr. Yan made her first public appearance on Fox News and, since then, has been continuing to spread the truth of COVID-19 on different platforms. The CCP’s defamation of Dr. Yan, which took place on both traditional media and social media involving CCP’s cyber army, also started right after Dr. Yan’s escape and came in huge waves continuously since then. 

【译】总之,真相被有意遮盖。当闫博士继续在路德社上揭露各种COVID-19的真相,包括提供情报(例如指出《柳叶刀》声明是有组织的试图压制实验室起源说的努力)并且分享她在各个方面——无症状感染、抗体评估、尸检报告、治疗方案、疫苗发展等——专业的分析的时候,中共终于发现了她的身份,这迫使她在2020年4月底离开了香港。闫博士成功逃离并抵达美国,在这里她向全世界继续揭露新冠的真相。2020年10月,闫博士第一次在福克斯新闻上公开露面,并且从那时起在各种平台持续传播COVID-19的真相。自那时起,中共在传统媒体和社交媒体(以其网络军)上对闫博士的诽谤也紧随她的出走而持续如巨浪般涌来。

(未完待续)

校对/发稿:飞虹

更多资讯,欢迎订阅美东香草山农场官方推特账号

更多文稿,欢迎浏览美东香草山GNEWS官方链接

更多香草山节目资讯,欢迎登陆G|TV — MOS Talk香草山访谈 & 香草山之声

0
0 评论
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments